When someone is nasty to someone else usually look for a constructive solution for both. In Italy this when someone is "uncomfortable" to someone else, especially if that someone is Berlusconi, peep the "dossier" ..
dossieraggio implemented by the Chairman of the Board and its communication with bodies of people "uncomfortable" is a fact so abnormal phenomenon in itself, as normal for the Italian people. Normal
because the population is even more surprising than that. Abnormal in such a way as to control a country is not acceptable to anyone, even more so by the Prime Minister.
After a week of "division" between the PDL and the current and future freedom, that is, when it was convenient to Berlusconi's party, came out of nowhere is the "Monte Carlo file" as a blessing from above.
But I do not believe in miracles, I do not think that the hand of fortune has helped the PDL, the dossier has been tailor-made, were composed specifically to discredit someone, to bring it down to the level of public consensus.
An individual documents placed before putting in a bad light a person is torn between two choices: to not believe the source from which they come or to take what he says any media (and by any means above all the empire Mediaset and the like) at face value, carrying out what the author of a dossier can be aiming for.
The point is that the so-called "Monte Carlo" is not an isolated incident, not the exception, is the rule.
This "method" is now used for years, is "method" that, in the same so, manages to achieve the goals set. Regardless of whether or not people accept the idea proposed by it, the individual who is explicitly takes this "worm" in mind as a thought, a possibility, even remote, it changes the relationship between ' individual and the person discredited; a doubt, an uncertainty that is in any case to affect our behavior.
These actions "tarnished" the image of someone and then have only effect on who takes everything at face value on people skeptical or otherwise, even radically changing their level of reputation to someone.
must therefore be vigilant, alert and prepared to distinguish between what is news, perhaps even shocking, but based on real events, from a "news" that distorts them and turning them unique model for someone, that one or more persons would have us believe, they want us thinking. From each
Marrazzo, the Monte Carlo case, the file Marcegaglia, counting all cases of discrediting people in favor of those in power, the question arises whether a party like the PDL has a section dedicated to this type of "investigation ".
Not that the dossier be kept as clean and provability, but are tailor made for newspapers and information networks in search of scoops, looking for services that attract a lot of their customers. Customers who do not make some distinction between news and genuine news "caricature" or even unfounded, without a real base.
The public digest, accept any news, without even perceive the difference between information and "information" without realizing that, even if only inadvertently, everyone is involved in what the law is the first to accept the first to believe everything that comes to us in his ear.
not to say that we are all mindless dupes who use the information that has the goal of dazed, but the mass, the average senior citizen or not abituato ad essere preso in giro dalla mattina alla sera, quando accende la tivù o la radio può confondere le due cose.
Basterebbe essere un “zic” più attenti, basterebbe tenersi informati responsabilmente, confrontando le varie fonti di notizia con il nostro parere, quello che è il nostro punto di vista, la nostra posizione rispetto ad un avvenimento, che non può essere sempre la stessa di chi la notizia ha diffuso. Purtroppo la politica e l'informazione stanno vivendo un momento buio, che non vuol dire che non accada nulla, anzi, accade troppo, sembra un circo, un vortice senza controllo che potrebbe distruggere tutto quello che incontra, tutto quello che oppone resistance.
My call is therefore to think about what happens, listen more to what we say our feelings, coming to reasoned conclusions, with a sense, consistent with our thinking and therefore to be in this society.
Tobia Alberti
PRODUCTION RESERVED ©
Overview "case Montecarlo"
(give this first part of the function of providing the reader an example of the topic below.)
History
July 27, 2010 It turns out that the "brother" of Gianfranco Fini, Giancarlo Tulliani, lives in an apartment in Monte Carlo that once belonged to An. The property in 1999 was bequeathed to the party by Countess Anna Maria Colleoni. An it had sold in 2008 to 300 thousand euro to offshore companies based in Saint Lucia in the Caribbean, the Printemps Ltd.
September 22 In a letter to the Minister of Justice, Rudolph Francis, assures behind Timar is Tulliani. The financial react accusing the government of dossieraggio.
September 26 Gianfranco Fini in un videomessaggio diffuso su internet nega di avere responsabilità dirette, spiegando chiaramente come stanno le cose, esprimendo qualche dubbio sul cognato Giancarlo: "Se dovesse emergere con certezza che Tulliani è il proprietario e che la mia buona fede è stata tradita, non esiterei a lasciare la presidenza della Camera".
7 ottobre Il Giornale riesce miracolosamente a strappare una conferma all'architetto romano Massimo Pelliccioni. Un mese prima il professionista aveva negato il coinvolgimento nella vicenda, ma dopo la testimonianza dell'imprenditore monegasco Luciano Garzelli, cui dava indicazioni via e-mail, si è arreso: "È vero, me ne sono occupato, ma non voglio parlare di questa storia".
8 ottobre "Quell'appartamento valeva 1,6 milioni di euro, non 300mila". Ad ipotizzarlo è La Destra, nella perizia allegata all'esposto bis presentato alla Procura di Roma il 5 ottobre. La stima è allegata all'esposto, e sottolinea il fatto che la vendita a 300mila euro alla società off shore Printemps Ltd è stata quasi un regalo, visto che l'appartamento valeva cinque volte quella cifra.
Articolo
Si sono bruscamente interrotti i colloqui tra gli ambasciatori di Berlusconi e Fini sui temi della giustizia. Negli ultimi giorni, infatti, il ministro Angelino Alfano Italo Bocchino and on the political front, Niccolo Ghedini and Giulia Bongiorno on the technical side, they had begun talks to establish an understanding and insights to help protect against Berlusconi from legal proceedings which he is interested. According to Finian, against the availability at harmonizing the relationships inside the center there is an escalation of the media campaign against the Speaker of the House by the press close to the prime minister. The orientation of Finian, therefore, leads to a stop to the dialogue on justice, in particular on legal shield. All this, just a few days after the House of the premier, who will comment on the Sept. 29 five-point program of government. With an unresolved question regarding the opportunity to place their trust.
In circles close to Fini - Fli sources said - would come into possession of "items that show a real dossieraggio activities, with the use of huge resources of money in Italy and abroad in order to produce and distribute false documents. " The whole purpose, it is claimed, to force the resignation Fini before 29 September, when there is speech to the House by the Prime Minister. "That is a crap document, a false ', so did well to think that we are behind the services. Gianfranco Fini - even before the meeting began morning and the Future of Freedom to decide yes Finian of the use of wiretaps to Cosentino - had already been able to express clearly and unambiguously in several of its closing of each form of dialogue with Berlusconi after the publication by newspapers of the Knight of the family and this gives the brother of Fini, Giancarlo Tulliani, the ownership of offshore companies owner of the house of Monte Carlo.
"Dossieraggio? It seems to me to pray for Finian. If anyone thinks, go by the judiciary - said the Minister Ignazio La Russa - The only dossieraggio lasted months and that of Berlusconi's alleged girlfriends. For months, was brought forward on the Republic and no one has brought up the intelligence. You may not like it, but campaign reports. These accusations remind me of how she used to in the '60s and '70s left when he said that everything was the fault of the CIA. We do not know how to put the gags and the newspapers as The Journal is not only to take care of Berlusconi's brother would not know what to do. It 's a story that can not be destroyed by anyone. "
Sources:
Gazzettino - Fini break with PDL: Pork, and false dossieraggio by 007 against me
0 comments:
Post a Comment