Non Renewing Sample Letter

active environmental disturbance space close to the ground

Pubblichiamo un documento ufficiale , tratto dal “ Center for Space Science and Engineering Research ”, da cui si evince che, quanto abbiamo ipotizzato negli anni scorsi sulle funzioni di H.A.A.R.P. . corrisponde al vero. Ci siamo avvalsi di numerosi studi e dei dati raccolti specialmente dal Professor Alessio Di Benedetto in modo da delineare un quadro consequenziale.

Anche corretta era la correlazione che abbiamo instaurato tra irradiazione di campi elettromagnetici, di differente frequenza e lunghezza, and dispersion of particulate matter ( chemtrails ) in different layers of the atmosphere. The metal particulate, which is electrically conductive, is well suited to enhance the radiation of electromagnetic waves and to promote chemical reactions. The importance of the text that we propose is not just a confirmation of various scenarios, but especially in connection with the dreaded blackout communications and electrical and electronic systems for NASA and other official agencies attribute, so instrumental to abnormal solar activity, whose peak is expected in 2012. It seems that the collapse of telecommunications is a draft prepared by the military to create chaos useful to the institution of the New World Order.

Another aspect worth noting: the ionosphere that reflects radio signals to earth, now deteriorated from military experiments, could do more as needed, as explained by Angelo Ciccarelli, the article " Weapon lethal climate ":" Craig Rodger, Department of Physics, University of Otago, New Zealand, gives us information about it. As China develops, in the event of war, to detonate nuclear bombs in orbit in order to disturb spy satellites for communication and positioning system (GPS) which, among other things, remote-controlled missiles and the bombs "fake" U.S. intelligence, the U.S. had set up the counter: that is precisely HAARP ' high-altitude nuclear explosion' says Rodger, ' generate charged particles remain trapped in the atmosphere for long. This highly ionized environment so blind spy satellites and launchers are orbiting at low altitude '. To counter this threat the U.S., with HAARP, have started a program called Radiation Belt Remediation , that is, more or less, Repair of radiation belt . According to the New Zealand physicist, the repair would be to shoot in order to radio a bassissima frequenza, che avrebbero il potere di soffiar via le particelle radioattive provocate dall'esplosione nucleare. Ma questo soffio di onde avrebbe anche un altro effetto: quello di trasformare la ionosfera, da specchio che riflette le normali onde dei programmi radiofonici e di telecomunicazione rendendone possibile l'ascolto in tutto il pianeta, in una spugna che assorbe le onde radio. Niente più comunicazioni: aerei e navi resterebbero senza guida da terra, i G.P.S. non funzionerebbero più e così via. La trasformazione della ionosfera avrebbe anche effetti possibili sul clima. I fisici di Otago li stanno studiando insieme all'Istituto meteorologico finlandese e all'Osservatorio Antartico britannico: hanno promesso una prossima pubblicazione sulla rivista scientifica Annales Geophysicae ".

Perturbazione attiva dell’ambiente spaziale vicino alla terra

Prof. Wayne A. Scales, PhD - Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering


Perché è un importante campo di ricerca?

- Permette uno studio della fisica di base dell’ambiente vicino alla Terra
- Consente il controllo di alcuni processi fisici nell’ambiente spaziale
- Permette una neutralizzazione delle comunicazioni del nemico e dei sistemi di navigazione militari
- Favorisce delle nuove tecniche di comunicazione militare


Come viene alterato lo spazio?

- Per mezzo dell’emissione di raggi carichi di particelle (ioni pesanti o raggi di elettroni)
- Rilascio di sostanze chimiche in grado di fotoionizzare ( bario )
- Diffusione di sostanze chimiche che sottraggono gli elettroni ( nickel carbonyl , sulfur hexafluride , trifluoromethyl bromide )
- Rilascio di particelle di aerosol (Residui del carburante dello Shuttle)
- Irradiazione di onde radio di alta potenza dallo spazio sulla terra ( H.A.A.R.P. , Arecibo , E.I.S.C.A.T. , Tromso )


Quali tipi di perturbazione vengono products?

-
density of electrons - the electron temperature
- conductivity of the plasma
- natural ionospheric currents (new communication technologies - See laser ndt)
- plasma waves and turbulence (can damage communications and interfere with radio signals)

Current projects

- Disturbed natural and artificial clouds in the space environment (funded NSF)
- Creating artificial clouds in space (funded dall'NRL)
- Creation of artificial plasma clouds in space remove radioactive particles following a nuclear explosion in upper atmosphere (finanziato dell’O.N.R. e dall’N.R.L.)


Nubi nottilucenti

- Ai confini dell’atmosfera (ottantacinque chilometri!)
- Composte di particolato caricato elettricamente
- Sistema tracciante per interferenze nell’alta atmosfera
- Associato con echi radar inusuali
- Riferito ai cambiamenti climatici globali

Illustrazione sotto: perturbazione di una turbolenza di una nuvola di particolato

La turbolenza è modificata per mezzo di onde radio in grado di generare calore. Ciò fornisce informazioni sulla nuvola di particolato in modo da implementare le misurazioni space.

Note: NSF is the National Science Foundation, NRL and the Naval Research Laboratory, ONR and the Office of Naval Research.

XXX thank the friend to report the document.

Did you like the article? Rate Ok or No. Thank you very much!
You can vote in my news this page.

Attack information CLICK HERE

CHEMTRAILS DATA

Range finder: come si sono svolti i fatti

Where Can I Buy Milani Blades In Austin Tx

Chemtrails: a diagram of Appleman and the militarization of meteorology

Pubblichiamo un testo scritto dall’amico Corrado Penna, tratto dal documento " Meteorologi e ministri: le contraddizioni insanabili " . La prima parte verte sulle mistificazioni dei negazionisti che, per tentare di confutare le evidenze sulle chemtrails, si richiamano spesso agli studi di Appleman sulle scie di condensazione. Sono studi ormai obsoleti e reductive who do not take account of progress in aviation. The second part concerns the web of conspiracies, censorship, misinformation which meteorologists, as the colonel Constant De Simone and Guido Guidi more, are the undisputed protagonists.



What about this morbid affection for the Appleman chart in 1953? Based on this empirical plot made more than 60 years, after surveys relating to aircraft engines that used very different from modern ones, you want to interpret what is happening today, trying to demonstrate the possibility that the contrails are formed even under conditions of low relative humidity.

yet it is well known (as is also explained in the document denial of Mr. Randi analyzed in the second part of the article) that the formation of contrails depends greatly on the engine, the temperature at which it operates and the type of impurity ( agents as condensation nuclei) are released together with the products of combustion, which means that 60 years of progress and innovation in the field of engineering for aircraft are not a minor detail.

How is it then you rely on that diagram (in which sometimes there could be contrails with low relative humidity) and there is no reference, however, in more recent studies (and certainly more reliable) in which insists that the contrail is formed only when it comes to moisture saturation? In this respect, we can not cite a source suspected U.S. air force or a document of 1975 ( Aviation weather ) in which is stated verbatim in page 144 as follows:

"The exhaust contrail is formed by the Additions to the atmosphere of Sufficient water vapor from aircraft exhaust gases to cause saturation or super-saturation of the air. Since heat is also added to the atmosphere in the wake on an aircraft, the addition of water vapor must be of such magnitude that it saturates or supersaturates the atmosphere in spite of the added heat”.

Ovvero:

“La scia di condensa del vapore fuoriuscito dal motore si forma a causa dell'immissione nell'atmosfera di vapore acqueo aggiunto dai motori dell'aereo in quantità sufficiente da causare la saturazione o sovrassaturazione dell'aria. Dal momento che l'atmosfera è anche surriscaldata dal motore dell'aereo, il vapore aggiunto deve essere di tale entità da saturare o sovrassaturare l'atmosfera, nonostante tale calore aggiuntivo”.

Come si potrebbe arrivare the saturation vapor oversaturation starting from very low relative humidity?

Moreover a recent text of Meteorology describes the phenomenon in the same terms, without invoking all'obsoleto diagram Appleman:

"The release of exhaust gases in the atmosphere of air, full of steam and condensation nuclei water, determines the oversaturation of water vapor and the formation of contrails. Contrails are formed at heights where the air temperature is very low (below -40 ° C), with relative humidity of 60%. The trails may or may not last over time, depending on the stability of the air and the amount of vapor. "[Jerome Sansosti & Alfio Giuffrida - Manual of Meteorology, A guide to understanding the weather and climate in conjunction with the UAI (Union Astrofili Italian) - Publisher Gremese - 2006 - pag. 86]

Also interesting is the question (cited in Aviation Weather ) heat-engine aircraft heat the air, helping to inhibit the formation of contrails. As you can see by reading this document on the history of flight , in the late 40's retire the old internal combustion engines and began the era of turbo-jets, which is referred to as jet aircraft (or, with English terminology, jets), and, gradually progressing technology of metal alloys, we will release more and more refractory materials that allow heat to build more powerful engines: engines are developing more energy and more heat. The above-named

diagram Appleman is precisely in 1953 and, after 20 years of progress and changes in the motor, the U.S. aviation industry relies on many other tools to assess the formation of contrails, because the engines increasingly more and more powerful heat is heat added more acts to inhibit the phenomenon of the contrails (Not for nothing are formed when the outside temperature is much lower than zero degrees Celsius).

Interesting is also what is stated on the condensation nuclei released with the exhaust of the aircraft: as a rule the nuclei of aggregation are quite large:

" Recent experiments However, Have Revealed That May Be visible exhaust contrails prevented by adding very minute nuclei material (dust for example) to the exhaust. Condensation and sublimation On These smaller nuclei result in contrail particle too small to be visible .

words:

" Recent experiments, however, revealed that the visible contrails can be avoided , adding tiny nuclei (dust for example) to what is emitted from the engine. The condensation and sublimation of these smaller nuclei produce condensation particles too small because the trail is visible .

This, in addition to confirming the importance of the engine type on the formation of contrails is reminiscent of the fact that the Air Force's interest to prevent the formation of contrails, because even with a plane concealing anti-radar systems would be visible in the eyes of an enemy, if you leave dietro una visibile scia di condensa. Mi chiedo allora: possibile che, a 30 anni di distanza dagli studi menzionati in un documento del 1975, l'aviazione militare non abbia già dotato i suoi apparecchi di tale tecnologia?

Se così fosse la probabilità che un velivolo militare generi una scie di condensa visibile sarebbe prossima allo zero, con buona pace di chi afferma che le scie rilasciate da formazioni di velivoli sono un fenomeno normale da attribuire ad aerei militari.

Ma torniamo alle cose dimostrabili con prove concrete, come alcuni video che qui di seguito riporto e che servono a rinforzare quanto già dimostrato nelle parti precedenti dell'articolo.

Questo è the video made (recently) an activist against the chemtrails in Florence, a town of the state of Oregon. The trajectories of these aircraft that seem to enjoy doing drawings of every shape in the sky, with plenty of trails that are close in on themselves, bring to mind the aforementioned claim of Colonel De Simone which I have already discussed at length in the first part:

"There are also points of reference on the ground over which the airways were also changes in direction at right angles. To an observer below the wakes appear to bend sharply. "

Explain, Mr. De Simone, how many flight paths pass over the city of Florence that form throughout the series Close up of right angles (!) so that they appear to an observer below (sic) so bent up to close on themselves? We are serious please: we know that the truth is otherwise, that they are chemtrails, or a deliberate plan of spraying chemical and biological agents and that she was involved (perhaps reluctantly, or so I hope) in this campaign of Holocaust denial propaganda.

One thing then we ask you, sir: this is the way that is authentic to the oath that he said many years ago, to defend their homeland? The country that has sworn to defend us, sir, and we do not feel protected by nothing to the hundreds of planes flying over our skies, releasing toxic compounds. Do you think it can really obey that oath at the same time and the orders it receives from the structure of which was found to be a part?

We can also imagine what arguments have convinced him to collaborate on this project many people who now seek to deny the evidence shown in this and other videos . Maybe they said that the Earth is very warming to the greenhouse effect of CO2 and that the only way to put a stop to this situation is that of geo-engineering, or reflective of the dispersion of particulate tutto intorno al pianeta, ma se si informa bene leggendo questi articoli e guardando questo documentario si rende conto che si tratta di una patetica scusa: se c'è un "effetto serra", esso è artificialmente creato proprio dalla diffusione delle scie chimiche.

O forse le hanno detto che la dispersione del particolato metallico è indispensabile per mantenere una supremazia militare basata sull'impiego di sistemi di rilevazione radar tridimensionali ed armi al plasma ; una supremazia militare nei confronti di un ipotetico nemico che, però, adopera le stesse scie chemical and the same technology on its territory, as it is easy to verify.

Or maybe they told her that biological agents are dispersed into the vaccines used to fight the spread of any pandemic, but if you read this well informed article on the pandemic and that the vaccines can also understand how these false arguments. The reality unfortunately is that the military system is a system of death, which wars have been fought to kill millions of people and make huge profits in a few sharks.

Scie circolari fotografate in Francia ... corridoi aerei con 4 angoli retti? Irrorazione di composti chimici semmai!

In ogni caso, l'operazione scie chimiche è un'operazione segreta che si cerca di tenere nascosta alla popolazione. Di recente le irrorazioni vengono intensificate nelle ore notturne oppure quando è disponibile una copertura nuvolosa dietro la quale gli aerei avvelenatori si nascondono alla vista (ma non certo all'udito). Davvero pensate che state collaborando ad un progetto segreto per il nostro bene che non ci può essere rivelato? Per favore, pensateci bene. Pensate davvero che si tratti di un progetto indispensabile per il bene comune, ma che occorra keep it secret to avoid being locked hysteria of the population or environmental organizations? Certainly environmental organizations, while being informed about chemtrails (of course we've thought for some time) have decided not to deal with, because their leaders have all been co-opted.

Maybe someone is persuaded that the transaction is essential to safeguard our health, maybe someone has been persuaded that it is an imperative to maintain a (poisonous) military superiority, pathetic excuses that do not bear comparison with reality, because, in addition to aerosol barium and aluminum, are of missing nanosensors whose distribution on civilian populations in times of peace can not be justified with any of the pathetic excuses that those responsible for the operation chemtrails may have provided to their subordinates.

But surely what is happening in our skies is highly immoral, because nobody can afford to decide on our behalf on matters relating to our health. Even if I believe in the bogeyman the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide , claim the same right to choose to suffer the heat, rather than being poisoned metal come l'alluminio ed il bario che causano malattie neurodegenerative.

La prego, signor colonnello, non si renda complice di questo moderno genocidio: siamo noi la patria che deve difendere e non quei poteri occulti che la spingono a rilasciare certe ridicole affermazioni.

Se ancora le mancano le prove su quelli che sono realmente gli effetti dell'operazione scie chimiche, si guardi questo video realizzato negli U.S.A., dove l'irrorazione chimico-biologica è iniziata verso il 1990. Apra gli occhi, signor colonnello, perché in questo mondo crudele chi inganna spesso è stato ingannato a sua volta. Apra il suo cuore, signor colonnello, si metta una mano on consciousness and be faithful to his country:

his country are we, 56 million Italian citizens!


Thanks friend Pirate Pantani to report the words "FAA - Aviation Weather 1975" .

Did you like the article? Rate Ok or No. Thank you very much!
You can vote in my news this page.

Attack information CLICK HERE

TANKER ENEMY TV: i filmati del Comitato Nazionale

CHEMTRAILS DATA

Range finder: come si sono svolti i fatti

Nike Snowboarding Bandana

Contrails: a rare phenomenon (article Klingor)

Dopo circa due anni di battaglie nell'affrontare il problema "scie chimiche" dal lato di chi "deve" (non per obbligo, ma per sfida personale) dimostrare che le chemtrails esistono, abbiamo voluto ribaltare la questione e si è quindi cercato di concentrare il nostro lavoro sul vero nodo dell'intricata vicenda: le contrails , ovvero le scie di condensazione. Perché mai? Semplice. I collaborazionisti di bassa lega con i quali ci tocca confrontarci, rappresentati da "meteorologi", pseudo scienziati, esponenti della N.A.S.A stessa, forumisti ecc., si oppongono a quella che essi definiscono "la teoria delle scie chimiche" (magari lo fosse), adducendo la solita solfa: "Si tratta di semplici scie di condensazione (contrails)".

Addirittura il sito MD-80.it ha messo insieme un'accozzaglia di spiegazioni che di scientifico hanno ben poco. Poiché, però, le loro osservazioni vengono presentate al pubblico in modo apparentemente plausibile, la maggior the readers to bite, concluding that chemtrails do not exist and that everyone in the world are observing only harmless water vapor and clouds composed of ice crystals. Nothing could be further from the truth and depistante, because we could see (and here I will show) that the formation of contrails is a phenomenon so rare that stride strongly with the frequency and massive spread of chemtrails in the skies of the world. Reading the following study (which promises more surprises) and watched the movie made in recent days, you will have the distinct feeling of having been duped for years: the history of the contrails is a vulgar screen behind which lurks a savage operation aerosol biochemical .

himself more Guido Guidi, interviewed during the broadcast RAI Geo & Geo, is as awkward champion of the theory of contrails and climbs on the mirrors, just to justify what he knows there is absolutely, especially in terms liars that the system we want to inculcate all costs. The formation of contrails is an uncommon phenomenon and can not continue to be a cover for the chemtrails! People of citizens cheated, harassed and poisoned ... WAKE UP!

For the most inattentive and to make clear to read the next lines, you remember the conditions necessary for the formation of condensation trails (contrails).

" According to FAA definition, a Contrail is formed above the 8000 meters, at temperatures below -40 ° C and a relative humidity greater than or equal to 70% .

The following in-depth study was carried out by the user KLINGOR (we thank).

In Italy there are 7 measuring stations located at:

Trapani, Brindisi, Cagliari, Pratica di Mare (Rome), S. Capofiume Pietro (BO), Milan and Udine. The surveys are conducted two times a day: at 00:00 and 12:00. I analyzed the data for the months of September, October and November (a very good hard work!) And these are the conclusions:

conditions favorable for the formation of "contrails" occur most frequently at midnight than at noon. Moreover, it appears (the care must be exercised given the paucity of data examined sin'ora) at noon that it is extremely rare that it can form a contrail. In fact, in the month di Settembre solo la stazione di Milano ha rilevato tali condizioni e precisamente il giorno 11. Stessa cosa ad ottobre: Milano, il giorno 25. Per quanto riguarda Novembre ci sono stati cinque (5) casi, quattro (4) a Cagliari (5-7-11-16) ed uno sempre a Milano (5). Per la stazione di Pratica di Mare mi sono spinto fino allo scorso Gennaio 2006 e questi sono gli esiti: gennaio = 30; febbraio, marzo, aprile e maggio = nessuno; giugno = 4-10-23; luglio, agosto, settembre, ottobre e novembre = nessuno.

La conclusione sembra essere che a mezzogiorno non dovrebbe essere visibile in cielo, se non molto raramente, alcuna "contrail". Diventa quindi molto importante datare le foto con l'orario in cui sono state scattate. Naturalmente... di particolare interesse sono quelle riprese intorno a mezzogiorno, diciamo tra le 11:00 e le 13:00. Logicamente ancora più "rilevanti" sono quelle scattate a quell'ora e nei dintorni delle stazioni di rilevamento.

Un consiglio... sarebbe il caso che un bel numero di persone facesse un back-up dei radiosondaggi prima che qualcuno li "aggiusti", diciamo cosi. L'indirizzo ve lo ricordo è: http://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.html

Clicca Qui per visionare la tabella riassuntiva delle rilevazioni.

A fianco della tabella principale ne ho inserita un'altra indicating which days the surveys were not performed and we can make an observation: on 15, 16, 17 and 18 September no probe has been sent by any of the stations. Other times (2 / 9, 11/10, 13/11 and 2) many stations have stopped simultaneously. It will not happen by chance something special in those days? Bah who knows maybe just routine ...

order to avoid any dispute about the numbers, I kept relatively large in the sense that I have taken as reference values \u200b\u200bfor temperature -40 (inclusive) and not -41 and 70% humidity (also included) and not 72%.


Also in December the conditions for the formation of contrails and 12:00 can be counted on the fingers of one hand. In fact only four (4): two (2) in Brindisi, in the days 7 and 21 , a (1) to Cagliari, 17 and a (1) in Trapani 20. With such data is absolutely inapplicable to the famous (and smoky ...) "Theory of contrails ", so dear to our feathered friends disinformation.

There are three (3) cases in the month of October, six (6) in November, and even twelve (12) in December. In January, only two cases in one week. Even more interesting is to note the sequence of consecutive days:

1) November 30, 1 and 2 December (3)
2) 12 and December 13 (2)
3) 27, 28, 29 and December 30 (4)
In
four (4) months you have not seen NEVER verified that a single station in favor of the condition was detected contrails for two consecutive days and we're talking about seven stations. Even observed three consecutive sequences of which even four days.

Now lets have some fun doing some little sum ...

Le stazioni sono sette (7). I mesi considerati sono quattro (4), per un totale di 122 giorni. 122 giorni moltiplicato 7 stazioni dà 854 rilevazioni. A queste bisogna sottrarre i 31 giorni di Dicembre ancora mancanti di S. Pietro Capodifiume e arriviamo a 823.

Poi bisogna sottrarre le mancate rilevazioni che sono 114. Arriviamo quindi a 709 rilevazioni.

I giorni in cui sono state registrate condizioni favorevoli per le contrails sono una (1) a Settembre, una (1) ad Ottobre, sei (6) a Novembre e quattro (4) a Dicembre, totale: 12. Ora... 12 diviso 709 dà 0,0169, che in percentuale è pari all'1,69%, ovvero rappresenta la probabilità che si verifichino conditions for the formation of contrails on any day around noon. This means that in 122 days considered, would have to be contrails in only two (2) days. Instead it has been documented twenty-two (22). And finally ... a small gem. If the probability of contrails in a day in case 1, 69% what is the probability of having two days in a row? The answer is

0.03% (0.0169 x0, 0169), namely one in 3333.

And what is at this point, the probability of having even four (4) consecutive days?

Incredibile ma vero...

La risposta è 0,000008% ovverosia una su 12.258.947 .

Per la lettura dei radiosondaggi: http://www.meteoverona.it/

Riassumendo ...

Le probabilità che si verifichino gli eventi descritti e documentati nelle righe precedenti sono le seguenti:

Posto che...

1. le scie di condensa si formano quando la temperatura è inferiore ai -40° e l'umidità relativa more than 70%
2. the frequency with which these conditions were observed by radiosonde was during the period under consideration, of ' 1.69%, ie a on about 59, and that this figure is taken as indicative of the likelihood of the phenomenon.

Then we have that ...

For sequences: ___________________________________________

We had three sequences of consecutive days where the trails have appeared: a sequence of two days, a 3 and a 4. The probability that such an event occurring is given by the following general formula:

sequence n times in days k = pn * (1-p) * kn (k-n +1)

(p raised to the n) * [(1-p) to high (kn)] * (k-n +1)

Chance of a sequence of 2 in 122 days = S2
Chance of a sequence of 3 in 122 days = S3
Chance of a sequence of 4 in 122 days = S4

S2 = (0.0169) 2 * (0.9831) 120 * 121 = .0045 = 1 / 222 = 0.44%

S3 = (0.0169) 3 * (0.9831) 119 * 120 = 0.0007 = 1/1.429 = 0.007%

S4 = (0.0169) 4 * (0.9831) * 119 = 118 = 0.000001 1/100.000 = 0.0001%

The overall probability that all three of the events in the period in question is this:

Total Chance = S2 * S3 * S4 = = 0.0000000000315 1/31.746.031.746

worry you got it, the probability is about .... Trentunomiliardisettecentoquarantaseimilionitrentunomilasettecentoquarantasei !!!!!

__________________________________________
contrails have been documented for 22 days on 122 around noon and the probability of formation of these 22 "contrails noon" is given by the following general formula:

combinations of n times in days k = pn * (1 -p) kn * Ck, n

(p raised to the n) * [(1-p) to high (kn)] * 122 combinations of elements in groups of 22


(0.0169) 22 * \u200b\u200b( 0.9831) 100 * C122, 0.000000000000000667 = 22 = =
1/1.498.215.825.938.276

... one in a million and a half billion .

And under this avalanche of numbers is finally buried the buffalo to the effect that what we see are merely contrails.

Someone probably will try to challenge the core of all this reasoning and that the value of the probability of the formation of contrails, which here was set at 1, 69%. Personally I think it is overstated, but even though it is not, even if continuing with the analysis of soundings turns out that the frequency was searched, say, 3 or 4 or 5%, there would ugualmente a risultati assurdi come quelli presentati qui.
Per avere 22 casi su 122 giorni la probabilità avrebbe dovuto essere attorno al 15-20%, cosa questa lontana anni, anzi millenni-luce dalla realtà.

© KLINGOR

Ti è piaciuto l'articolo? Vota Ok oppure No. Grazie Mille!
Puoi votare le mie notizie anche in questa pagina .

Attacco all'informazione CLICCA QUI

Chemtrails DATE

Range finder: how the facts are