Mario Salieri Skin Heads

La soglia della frenesia

Life is always faster, quicker, more frenetic.

We are all inclined to do more and more into the background leaving ourselves without thinking about what we really want and without taking breaks, of detachment from everyday life.

Every day we leave, we feel that this is not realizing, without being attention. However, comparing the past to the present day, immediately struck the eye. The population is much more stressful, life requires an ever higher level of frenzy, working, attachment to do.

You can not blame anyone in particular, nor is it easy to find a response in ourselves. Simply advancing the time, the evolution of culture, society and the organization globally, has led to levels of existential rage''''higher and higher.

In moments of reflection, of crisis, we question: how did I get to this point? What brought me here? It is not clear answers, often once past the difficult moment you forget everything and start again as before. Should instead try to learn from the mistakes, our own or those that the environment around us leads us to commit and live.

immersing themselves in a society like today it's hard not to be influenced not be inclined to do as others do, to do as much as the people around us, equally influenced and dependent on what the''Today''ambiente requires, what the world today takes to be.

All internally can get to claim to be too stressed, too tired from life as a means in this era, it is difficult to achieve what you want to be, that which you would like to join. As

that you tend not to learn from the falls, has always brought to his feet without calculating damage, regardless of and prevent the next fall.

We could say that we have a short memory or just listen to ourselves, but in any case the credit, the guilt or the final responsibility should be sought in the belief that today's society leads us to be: people, machines that produce more the better , people who are so work-frenzy view fail to realize that I could not comprehend or admit it to himself. Who does not maintain a certain level is''out''is not part of the community and not be taken into account, marginalized.

This is part of evolution, everyone can evaluate it positively or negatively, in any case is so, and only a radical change could reverse the trend.

would be instructive to wake up one morning and find yourself in 1800. Of course, every era has its hardships, for sure now many things have improved, but by analyzing our concept of "day" would be the same?

I believe that modern man could give the head a busy mind like ours inserted in a completely different I do not support the strike. We find ourselves in an unknown dimension, which we do not know the values, rules, and above all attitudes.

It would be positive wake up one morning in our world, in everyday life and be relaxed, calm, relaxed. Face the day with a view to reaching a positive and peaceful end of the day, maybe even tired, but in any case calm and positive as it was in the morning, getting up from bed.

Tobia Alberti

PRODUCTION RESERVED ©

Note copyright

This article, rather than processing itself, and be a starting point reflection as they read it, finding ways of improving their "relationship with life."

Psychtrist In Buffalo, Ny And Surrounding Areas

A colpi di dossier

When someone is nasty to someone else usually look for a constructive solution for both. In Italy this when someone is "uncomfortable" to someone else, especially if that someone is Berlusconi, peep the "dossier" ..

And everything magically calms down.

now in Italy there has become a habit. The so-called

dossieraggio implemented by the Chairman of the Board and its communication with bodies of people "uncomfortable" is a fact so abnormal phenomenon in itself, as normal for the Italian people. Normal

because the population is even more surprising than that. Abnormal in such a way as to control a country is not acceptable to anyone, even more so by the Prime Minister.

After a week of "division" between the PDL and the current and future freedom, that is, when it was convenient to Berlusconi's party, came out of nowhere is the "Monte Carlo file" as a blessing from above.

But I do not believe in miracles, I do not think that the hand of fortune has helped the PDL, the dossier has been tailor-made, were composed specifically to discredit someone, to bring it down to the level of public consensus.

An individual documents placed before putting in a bad light a person is torn between two choices: to not believe the source from which they come or to take what he says any media (and by any means above all the empire Mediaset and the like) at face value, carrying out what the author of a dossier can be aiming for.

The point is that the so-called "Monte Carlo" is not an isolated incident, not the exception, is the rule.

This "method" is now used for years, is "method" that, in the same so, manages to achieve the goals set. Regardless of whether or not people accept the idea proposed by it, the individual who is explicitly takes this "worm" in mind as a thought, a possibility, even remote, it changes the relationship between ' individual and the person discredited; a doubt, an uncertainty that is in any case to affect our behavior.

These actions "tarnished" the image of someone and then have only effect on who takes everything at face value on people skeptical or otherwise, even radically changing their level of reputation to someone.

must therefore be vigilant, alert and prepared to distinguish between what is news, perhaps even shocking, but based on real events, from a "news" that distorts them and turning them unique model for someone, that one or more persons would have us believe, they want us thinking. From each

Marrazzo, the Monte Carlo case, the file Marcegaglia, counting all cases of discrediting people in favor of those in power, the question arises whether a party like the PDL has a section dedicated to this type of "investigation ".

Not that the dossier be kept as clean and provability, but are tailor made for newspapers and information networks in search of scoops, looking for services that attract a lot of their customers. Customers who do not make some distinction between news and genuine news "caricature" or even unfounded, without a real base.

The public digest, accept any news, without even perceive the difference between information and "information" without realizing that, even if only inadvertently, everyone is involved in what the law is the first to accept the first to believe everything that comes to us in his ear.

not to say that we are all mindless dupes who use the information that has the goal of dazed, but the mass, the average senior citizen or not abituato ad essere preso in giro dalla mattina alla sera, quando accende la tivù o la radio può confondere le due cose.

Basterebbe essere un “zic” più attenti, basterebbe tenersi informati responsabilmente, confrontando le varie fonti di notizia con il nostro parere, quello che è il nostro punto di vista, la nostra posizione rispetto ad un avvenimento, che non può essere sempre la stessa di chi la notizia ha diffuso.

Purtroppo la politica e l'informazione stanno vivendo un momento buio, che non vuol dire che non accada nulla, anzi, accade troppo, sembra un circo, un vortice senza controllo che potrebbe distruggere tutto quello che incontra, tutto quello che oppone resistance.

My call is therefore to think about what happens, listen more to what we say our feelings, coming to reasoned conclusions, with a sense, consistent with our thinking and therefore to be in this society.

Tobia Alberti

PRODUCTION RESERVED ©

Overview "case Montecarlo"

(give this first part of the function of providing the reader an example of the topic below.)

History

July 27, 2010 It turns out that the "brother" of Gianfranco Fini, Giancarlo Tulliani, lives in an apartment in Monte Carlo that once belonged to An. The property in 1999 was bequeathed to the party by Countess Anna Maria Colleoni. An it had sold in 2008 to 300 thousand euro to offshore companies based in Saint Lucia in the Caribbean, the Printemps Ltd.

September 22 In a letter to the Minister of Justice, Rudolph Francis, assures behind Timar is Tulliani. The financial react accusing the government of dossieraggio.

September 26 Gianfranco Fini in un videomessaggio diffuso su internet nega di avere responsabilità dirette, spiegando chiaramente come stanno le cose, esprimendo qualche dubbio sul cognato Giancarlo: "Se dovesse emergere con certezza che Tulliani è il proprietario e che la mia buona fede è stata tradita, non esiterei a lasciare la presidenza della Camera".

7 ottobre Il Giornale riesce miracolosamente a strappare una conferma all'architetto romano Massimo Pelliccioni. Un mese prima il professionista aveva negato il coinvolgimento nella vicenda, ma dopo la testimonianza dell'imprenditore monegasco Luciano Garzelli, cui dava indicazioni via e-mail, si è arreso: "È vero, me ne sono occupato, ma non voglio parlare di questa storia".

8 ottobre "Quell'appartamento valeva 1,6 milioni di euro, non 300mila". Ad ipotizzarlo è La Destra, nella perizia allegata all'esposto bis presentato alla Procura di Roma il 5 ottobre. La stima è allegata all'esposto, e sottolinea il fatto che la vendita a 300mila euro alla società off shore Printemps Ltd è stata quasi un regalo, visto che l'appartamento valeva cinque volte quella cifra.

Articolo

Si sono bruscamente interrotti i colloqui tra gli ambasciatori di Berlusconi e Fini sui temi della giustizia. Negli ultimi giorni, infatti, il ministro Angelino Alfano Italo Bocchino and on the political front, Niccolo Ghedini and Giulia Bongiorno on the technical side, they had begun talks to establish an understanding and insights to help protect against Berlusconi from legal proceedings which he is interested. According to Finian, against the availability at harmonizing the relationships inside the center there is an escalation of the media campaign against the Speaker of the House by the press close to the prime minister. The orientation of Finian, therefore, leads to a stop to the dialogue on justice, in particular on legal shield. All this, just a few days after the House of the premier, who will comment on the Sept. 29 five-point program of government. With an unresolved question regarding the opportunity to place their trust.

In circles close to Fini - Fli sources said - would come into possession of "items that show a real dossieraggio activities, with the use of huge resources of money in Italy and abroad in order to produce and distribute false documents. " The whole purpose, it is claimed, to force the resignation Fini before 29 September, when there is speech to the House by the Prime Minister.

"That is a crap document, a false ', so did well to think that we are behind the services. Gianfranco Fini - even before the meeting began morning and the Future of Freedom to decide yes Finian of the use of wiretaps to Cosentino - had already been able to express clearly and unambiguously in several of its closing of each form of dialogue with Berlusconi after the publication by newspapers of the Knight of the family and this gives the brother of Fini, Giancarlo Tulliani, the ownership of offshore companies owner of the house of Monte Carlo.

"Dossieraggio? It seems to me to pray for Finian. If anyone thinks, go by the judiciary - said the Minister Ignazio La Russa - The only dossieraggio lasted months and that of Berlusconi's alleged girlfriends. For months, was brought forward on the Republic and no one has brought up the intelligence. You may not like it, but campaign reports. These accusations remind me of how she used to in the '60s and '70s left when he said that everything was the fault of the CIA. We do not know how to put the gags and the newspapers as The Journal is not only to take care of Berlusconi's brother would not know what to do. It 's a story that can not be destroyed by anyone. "

Sources:
Gazzettino - Fini break with PDL: Pork, and false dossieraggio by 007 against me

Licenses For Illegal Immigrants

How long! My

Rossella, quanto tempo! Tempo di un mio silenzio che non ti era stato annunciato; tempo di una mia assenza che non ti era stata confidata; tempo di una mia distrazione dai laccioli tuoi stretti intorno alle membra; tempo di libertà.
Libertà tanto più irrispettosa perché colta all’improvviso, come un bacio rubato, fuggitivo; un bacio sul quale ci si attarda poi col cuore colpevole mentre, stordite e palpitanti, ci si nasconde dietro un tendaggio, lungo un corridoio, dove altri potrebbero passando udirne il sospiro.
Questa libertà, Rossella, me la sono goduta, avida di tradimento. Non era libertà di movimento, di correre finalmente slegata; oppure libertà di mostrarmi senza il peso di un giogo sulle spalle. Era libertà pura, di quella che non fa pensare, ricordare, sapere di essere legata a te, da te. Era la libertà di essere lontana da qualsiasi possibilità di volerti o doverti dare un segno che non ero morta. Era la libertà legittimata da un alibi di forza maggiore. Era la libertà di una vacanza. Eppure…
Eppure, un mattino, in mezzo alla folla dei turisti, noto tra gli altri un volto di donna. Questo volto lo riconosco e mi attardo nell’impressione. Altri non è che il volto tuo, Rossella.
Eppure, una sera, distendendo il mio corpo, accarezzandolo nella penombra, donandogli sollievo per la fatica richiesta quel giorno, le mie mani cercano il collo e si racchiudono intorno ad esso. Lo tengono premuto, leggermente, come fossi immobilizzata alla gogna. Scoperto quel gioco, l’ho condiviso nel mio pensiero con te, Rossella.
Eppure un giorno, infine (quanto time!), we find Scarlett. A track ball separates us whole, women sheathed in their shiny clothes lattex separate us dancing. My own dialogue with you between us, as if ashamed of this freedom enjoyed, so it does not dare any momentum.
then remain there, at the edge of the runway, the margin of a fact difficult to confirm, and I suffer.
I suffer from depression, lost in the discovery of a bulky estrangement, to whom he returns home from time to remote districts.