Imagine that one day, entire sections of your library are not accessible. There will never be told what specific books, and why they were removed, but you only get a sign informing you that someone, somewhere, for some reason, reported that the books of that section violates the rights of someone ' more. Imagine also accessible from the shelves of the library books without constantly remove someone that you or other users of the library, you can find out which volumes have been removed, and without it there is given the opportunity to assess whether the removal of some of these books violates Your fundamental rights.
Do you think this could not happen in a democracy?
If the copyright will not be regulated to ensure that even in the digital realm there is a balance between different interests in society, as an instrument of emancipation for content producers, it inevitably becomes a system of pervasive censorship and control.
The Communications Regulatory Authority with Resolution 668/2010 of December 2010 for consultation a text that aims to establish a mechanism that will allow it to completely inhibit the accessibility of sites and places outside the Italian territory to remove suspicious content infringing the copyright in an automatic way and without reference to any requirement found guilty of the Judiciary.
sections of the "library" to which the Internet can no longer access information portals include foreign suspects without infringing the copyright that this is somehow found, most commonly used systems to gain access to information necessary ; for the exchange of free software and know the works available in the public domain and openly licensed.
The individual "books" will include items removed pubblicati da giornali, banche dati di pubbliche amministrazioni e di privati, documenti riservati finiti in rete ed utili per conoscere fatti che l’opinione pubblica potrebbe non conoscere diversamente, video amatoriali e fotografie con sottofondo musicale caricate dagli utenti nelle piattaforme di condivisione, singole pagine di blog amatoriali contenenti anche un solo file in violazione del diritto d’autore.
Per scongiurare che tutto ciò avvenga in modo silenzioso, ci appelliamo all’Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni affinché effettui una moratoria sulla nuova regolamentazione sul diritto d’autore.
No new rules will be adopted until the Parliament will not be able to be home to a wide public debate to find a new balance between copyright and the danger of leading to new charges and to introduce measures to protect the right to know that Authority expects the same.
We ask this grace because we know what regulations introduced without a proper assessment of their impact may have very different effects from those contemplated.
ask this moratorium because we fear that the tasks that rely upon the regulatory authority will take Guarantor size unmanageable by the Authority and will soon be followed by a congestion probably approaching or mere discretion.
We also believe that the Authority is dangerous to push directly to regulate areas that the Constitution entrusts to the legislature and the judiciary and in other countries have long been the subject of parliamentary debates, or, as is often the case with the network , self-regulation within the perimeters of the traditional laws allow.
We call on MPs of all parties so that Parliament can be the subject of a debate involving all actors in the network and the leading international experts in the field.
In this way you will get the result to give back to Parliament the indispensable role of interlocutor with civil society, and to respect the principle of separation of state powers.
0 comments:
Post a Comment